Latest research published in the Lancet estimates the number of deaths in 2010 from malaria at 1.2 million globally compared with a previous estimate by the WHO of 665,000. The new model, from the Institute of Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME), aims to overcome the problems of unreliable health reporting in some countries. The most staggering difference between the WHO and the IHME’s estimate it the number of children over five dying from malaria which is eight times higher in the IHME estimate. Scientists from the IHME explain that this is as a result of a belief that adults have some immunity to malaria which they argue is not the case. As a result they have adjusted their statistics to include deaths recorded as a result of fever. However, other epidemiologists argue that this may not be the case and whilst this is a good starting point better disease surveillance is needed to confirm the number of deaths of malaria.
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn21424-malaria-may-kill-far-more-people-than-we-thought.html
www.guardian.co.uk/news/datablog/2012/feb/03/malaria-deaths-mortality
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-16854026
Our media policy
This is the era of applied microbiology with stories every day in the media about avian flu, MRSA, C. difficile and MMR to name just a few. A measure of the respect that SfAM's Communication team has gained is that journalists contact us for background briefing and explanation as well as the names of microbiologists they can contact.
We will:
always do our best to provide facts, information and explanation
if speculation is required, explain the rationale behind that speculation
desist from hyping a story - whether it is the journalist or the scientist doing the hyping